Dillo MS Windows Port

Roger <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I spent some time last night examining the Dillo Windows port, as well as the 
DPLus version.

The DPlus version has multiple patches for extra (likely not-needed?) features 
atop of the Windows port.  So further limited my research to the Dillo Windows 
port to see what was only needed for Dillo to be functionally compiled on 
Windows platforms under Mingw.

Performing a "diff -urN" on the Windows port against the vanilla Dillo-1.3.0, 
showed at the very end some stuff concerning socks.h/winsock2.h portability.  
There were other modifications, but not sure if those were really needed.

Would appear they performed a lot of work, and it's sad to see the work just 
being ignored.  Would be nice to see some basic portability for Windows 
integrated.  However, basic and standardized work that is clean and can be 
integrated within the main Dillo tree.  Would appear the DPlus version work 
went further with extra features, and can easily understand why they were 
likely not wanted within the main Dillo tree.


-- 
Roger
http://rogerx.freeshell.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.