Re: Status of dillo_grows
Nick Warne <nick-ucsffw2X/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17/04/16 11:40, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > On Do, Apr 14, 2016, Nick Warne wrote: >> I am sorry, this build is borken: >> >> http://forums.thinkbroadband.com > > This is a problem with CSS `height`. Consider this HTML: > > <table style="height: 20px; border: 1px solid"> > <tr> > <td>Sunt autem quidam e nostris, qui haec subtilius velint > tradere et negent satis esse, quid bonum sit aut quid > malum, sensu iudicari, sed animo etiam ac ratione > intellegi posse et voluptatem ipsam per se esse > expetendam et dolorem ipsum per se esse > fugiendum. itaque aiunt hanc quasi naturalem atque > insitam in animis nostris inesse notionem, ut alterum > esse appetendum, alterum aspernandum sentiamus. Alii > autem, quibus ego assentior, cum a philosophis > compluribus permulta dicantur, cur nec voluptas in bonis > sit numeranda nec in malis dolor, non existimant > oportere nimium nos causae confidere, sed et > argumentandum et accurate disserendum et rationibus > conquisitis de voluptate et dolore disputandum > putant.</td> > </tr> > </table> > > Dillo shows the table only 20px high, while Firefox seems to treat > `height` the same way as `min-height`. I'm not sure which is correct, > but probably we ought to do something about this, even if dillo is > correct. Using Dillo 3.0.5, that table looks the same in Dillo, Firefox and links/lynx (but no border in links or lynx, of course). ? Nick -- Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"