Re: New design of tag nesting cleanup within the parser.
Jorge Arellano Cid <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:10:42AM -0400, Ben Woolley wrote: > > > > On Jun 23, 2016, at 9:00 AM, eocene <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Jorge wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:15:36PM +0000, eocene wrote: > >>> Yet another possibility is: "needs to be closed". > >> > >> It also sounds OK to me. > >> > >> Which one is better? > > > > I would choose 'needs'. > > > > It seems that compilers use the word "expected" to connote a > softer tone, like it is just the way that they interpret it. > "Expected <small> to be closed" would be the way to say it in > that way. "Needs" implies that you need to do it in any case, > but "expected" implies that you just need to do it to fix this > particular case. > > However, I do like using "needs" for the bug meter, because it > is a bug meter, not a warning message. It is there to tell you > what to fix. :) Thanks for the feedback. Committed. -- Cheers Jorge.-