Re: Patch: Zero detected HTML errors

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 01:56:14PM +0100, Nick Warne wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 17:13:59 -0400
> Jorge Arellano Cid <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >   OK, let's take a look at this one.
> > 
> >   The idea is to inform that the  bug meter detected zero HTML errors,
> > not that the doc is perfect (because the bug meter checks a subset of
> > the syntax/grammar legalese).
> > 
> >   How is that best expressed in english?
> > 
> > > -      a_Dialog_msg("Dillo: Valid HTML!", "Zero detected HTML
> > > errors!");
> > > +      a_Dialog_msg("Dillo: Valid HTML!", "Detected no HTML
> > > errors!");  
> 
> Well, lets suppose that someone is called 'Zero'.
> 
> "Zero detected HTML errors!"
> 
> implies that he/she detected errors!

  Thanks. This makes it clear to me.

> 
> What about: "Could not detect any HTML errors!"
> 
> which then implies that the current bug meter thinks it's OK (but as we
> know, there _still_ may be HTML errors.

  One more question, why not?

    1. "No HTML errors detected!" or

    2. "Zero HTML errors detected!" or

    3. "Detected zero HTML errors!"


  ** If I choose by replacing pronouns I'd have:

    1. "He" detected!
    2. "He" detected!
    3. Dtected him!

  I'd choose 3.- as 1.- and 2.- are wrong. Am I right?


-- 
  Cheers
  Jorge.-