Re: URL field / Loading page images / Refreshing DNS cache: Correction
John Gaffney <jgaffney-W1WbbPd4oPN/W2okNb46yti2O/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jorge Arellano Cid <[email protected]> writes: > Hi John, > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 05:16:04PM -0400, John Gaffney wrote: >> [...] >> > In the current snapshot, the navigation bar has changed, and the URL >> > field does not seem to be taking into account font_factor -- with the >> > result that the window is smaller than the font height. You can test >> > this by setting, e.g., font_factor=2.0 in your dillorc (most >> > dramatically for a tiny panel with small icons). The issue seems to >> > be with this factor not being taken into account when bh and lh are >> > set in make_panel() in ui.cc. >> [...] >> >> I meant what is actually called the "location box," and on comparing >> the code for 3.0.5 to the snapshot of a few days ago, I see that there >> has been no change in the section of make_panel() in ui.cc that sets >> the values of bh, lh, etc. The change that has caused the problem is >> the addition of line 466 of ui.cc: >> >> i->textsize((int) rint(14.0 * prefs.font_factor)); >> >> But the height of the CustInput i is still set to lh, which does not >> take into account prefs.font_factor. > > Yes man. > > That was a quick patch (#4222 in Hg) for a larger font. > > I'll look at it after I finish a general rendering algorithm bug > I'm working in. > > Please be patient. > > BTW, do you really need a font size that enlarges the location box? or > would it be enough to clamp the font size to fit in? The second case is > a much simpler patch. No rush! I was just pointing out the issue; for myself, just commenting out the above line works just fine by reverting to the old behavior and smaller font size in the location bar.