Re: Is Dillo development still active?
John DiMarco <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In message <20211128211824.7c4afab8@aktux>you write: >On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 11:19:33 -0500 >John DiMarco <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm not sure there is anyone minding the store re: dillo.org and the >> mercurial repo, at least based on what I saw in May. Perhaps we should >> work with your git fork instead? >> > >generally it is a good idea. Since there is no development here, I >would think that I could shut down the mercurial repo. There are enough >places to set up a git repo and you can have repos at several place if >you do not want to be dependant on one service. Could leave it up (to retain the snapshotted state of the code plus its history) but mark it as inactive, and point people to an active git repo instead. I don't know if we want multiple repos: if we can manage one where active development is occuring, that'd be a good accomplishment. Regards, John -- John DiMarco <[email protected]> http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~jdd IT Director, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto Office: BA4252 1-416-978-5300 Fx:1-416-946-5464 Skype:jddimarco _______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev http://www.dillo.org/ You get this email because your address [email protected] is in the mailing list dillo-dev.