Re: Option to define external link handler

Rodrigo Arias <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 02:57:44PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
>> So there is no need to download the file completely before it is 
>> piped to the tools.
>
>I don't think mupdf will open a file piped from stdin. Neither does
>nsxiv. Maybe I'm missing something.

Apparently that's the case, although it should be possible to do:

https://mupdf.readthedocs.io/en/1.22.0/progressive-loading.html

However, Okular and Zathura seem to be able to open PDFs from the 
standard input as a pipe. Same with feh for images.

>It is possible to determine the Content-Type without downloading the 
>file with something like:
>
>curl -XHEAD -s -w '%{content_type}' $url

Yes, but it will require another GET request to download the actual 
file.

I think we can just begin a GET request from Dillo, parse the HTTP 
headers, select the appropriate handler from the mime, and either pipe 
the content to it or write it to a file and then pass the file path.

The first option would allow doing it without waiting for the whole file 
to download. In fact, it should be possible to not download more than 
what is being consumed by the handler program. One of the Dillo main 
objectives is to support slow download speeds (or metered) gracefully.

>> Executing a user script is fine, but I also want to be able to rewrite
>> the page and bring it back to Dillo for display, which requires more
>> cooperation.
>
>I'm curious what the use-case for this is. Sounds interesting.

For example, you could write a filter program that parses HTML and 
rewrites the links to JS hungry websites to alternative ones, in the 
same way libredirect[1] works.

[1]: https://libredirect.github.io/

This also allows patching the HTML of sites so you can fix them to work 
better (or at all) in Dillo. This is also done by Firefox from the 
webcompat[2] project in what they call "interventions", as sometimes 
page authors don't fix them or take a long time, so they patch it from 
the browser directly. You can open about:compat to see the long list of 
patches, here[3] is one for YouTube.

[2]: https://webcompat.com/
[3]: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/1fa7de8dec52

This already happened to Dillo with Hacker News, and there are still 
some minor issues not solved. The matching rules should apply those 
corrections only to the set of matching URLs.

Best,
Rodrigo.
_______________________________________________
Dillo-dev mailing list -- dillo-dev-lx9mn2B4QYRWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to dillo-dev-leave-lx9mn2B4QYRWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.