Re: Option to define external link handler
Rodrigo Arias <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.dillo.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Diego On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 01:36:19PM +0200, Diego wrote: >I think a good way is to reduce functionality to a minimum. Not to make a >full scripting language, but rather moderately complex hook rules that can >call external scripts or DPIs with complex functionality. This is not a scripting language, just a way to describe rules that can be transformed in quick operations at runtime. We won't be reinventing JS. >Another mistake that can be made is to replace the DPI infrastructure. I >think a cooperation between the two is better. There is no plan to remove the support for DPI plugins, just to increase the capabilities for hooking. >DPIs and authorized scripts can set temporary rules and be called by dillo >on events. >Fixed rules in a rules file call complex scripts or DPIs. That's more or less the idea. >The problem with the DPI infrastructure is that it is an unfinished >infrastructure with very little documentation. There are other structural problems, please check the related issues. https://github.com/dillo-browser/dillo/issues/65 https://github.com/dillo-browser/dillo/issues/56 Best, Rodrigo. _______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list -- dillo-dev-lx9mn2B4QYRWk0Htik3J/[email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to dillo-dev-leave-lx9mn2B4QYRWk0Htik3J/[email protected]