Re: [Future] reject() value type

Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.dom.general
Message-ID <CADnb78ix++=A1U4cCp1PJ1dTjDwnPEjwujnDU2RypZ_b2HjPLg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Mounir Lamouri <[email protected]> wrote:
> Finally, as David Bruant suggested to me, I think it would be good to
> advertise the error type in the IDL as much as the success type, like
> "Future<Success, Error>", so developers don't have to guess what is
> returned when an error occurs.

This part makes sense for APIs defined by the platform, but for any
other purpose errors should just match whatever you can do with throw
today.


--
http://annevankesteren.nl/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.