Re: Deprecating Future's .then()

"Tab Atkins Jr." <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.dom.general
Message-ID <CAAWBYDBYA64t-mpEbnfny57mAWUu49t0Nj5m+y3+2Uv1oDnJgA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Sean Hogan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Should the spec continue to allow this behavior?
>
> or ...
>
> Should the resolve algorithm - which is currently infinite unwrap for
> accepted / fulfilled futures - also be infinite unwrap for rejected futures?

I'm satisfied with either behavior.  It might be nice to have it
mirror the then/chain behavior, where it fully-unwraps or
single-unwraps as appropriate, but I'd likely be fine with both doing
single-unwrapping or both doing full-unwrapping.

~TJ
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.