Re: [promises] resolver's resolved flag check on promise callback

Yutaka Hirano <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.dom.general
Message-ID <CABihn6HUYXGsbjQERss4gDAcAfeOzSFuAjmiBgFqq8c3m0cG_g@mail.gmail.com>
Thank you very much.
> You could still get something weird if someone gets passed a resolve
> and reject callback and invokes them both, resolve first with a promise
> and then reject, as in that case reject would win, but given they're
> invoking methods more than once, maybe that's okay? Or maybe there's a
> better way still?
You are right, but I think it is OK.



On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Yutaka Hirano <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > If so, can we have the state check in fulfill / reject algorithms?
>
> I guess having the check there, in addition to making sure the public
> methods can each only be invoked once, is probably about right. You
> could still get something weird if someone gets passed a resolve and
> reject callback and invokes them both, resolve first with a promise
> and then reject, as in that case reject would win, but given they're
> invoking methods more than once, maybe that's okay? Or maybe there's a
> better way still?
>
>
> --
> http://annevankesteren.nl/
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.