Re: MutationObserver does not observe state changes
Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.dom.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/31/13 1:03 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: > Maybe just certain properties should be called out as observable (i.e. change records will be fired for them). The motivation would be to eliminate the plethora of "xchanged" events we keep introducing into specs, in favor of a centralized mechanism. Fwiw, this seems pretty reasonable to me. -Boris