RE: [DOMError]: Subclassing DOMError to increase granularity of error handling?

Ok, thanks for this information Anne. I guess that I should keep the current solution in the Raw Socket API until the DOMException solution has been defined in the DOM specification.

BR
  Claes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Anne van Kesteren
> Sent: den 6 augusti 2013 11:54
> To: Nilsson, Claes1
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DOMError]: Subclassing DOMError to increase granularity
> of error handling?
> 
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Nilsson, Claes1
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > WDYT about this approach? Is this a reasonable solution?
> 
> DOMError is going away. We only need DOMException. Allen (editor of
> ECMAScript) did suggest we do something like what you suggest. Have
> DOMException.prototype.subname which gives a more detailed name and
> ideally have DOMException.name be "DOMException" but we can probably no
> longer do that. Still need to work out the details here unfortunately
> as apparently last time we thought we figured error handling out we
> didn't :/
> 
> 
> --
> http://annevankesteren.nl/