Re: baseURI / xml:base

On 8/9/13 5:37 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> FWIW, just the other day I was suggesting to Dimitry that xml:base would
> be useful for use with templates and shadow content. I'd be happy to
> remove the markup-level feature (or maybe make it more HTML-friendly), but
> per-node base URLs are something that I think we'll need more and more in
> the coming years. Syndication, widgets, templating, etc, all would benefit
> greatly from this kind of thing.

Do these need _mutable_ per-node base urls, or per-node base urls that 
are created once, at node creation time, and then persist forever?

I would be much happier, personally, with immutable per-node base urls.

-Boris