Re: Promises: final steps
Anne van Kesteren <annevk-6shE6wEKUUpmR6Xm/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.javascript.ecmascript4.general,gmane.comp.web.dom.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADnb78gN+u=WY54obQ-NCHMTXAvwXWQizp_EXyANsYfjcjCtFQ@mail.gmail.com> |
(Added back the other lists.) On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Brendan Eich <brendan-b/[email protected]> wrote: > Let's put done back in. It's the right thing. Given what has been said thus far https://github.com/domenic/promises-unwrapping/issues/19 my inclination is still to leave it out initially and give a version without done() six months to a year to mature. Not having done() can make promises harder to debug in the short term, but adding done() is trivial to do later. And given the lack of native promise implementations to date there's no way for us to test the done()-less design without trying it first. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/