Re: Adding an interface to provide a list of listeners

Oooh!  I was unaware that it had been discussed previously.  I will do a
mailing list search.  If you have any pointers, I would love to see them.


On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Ms2ger <[email protected]> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Shane,
>
> On 07/17/2014 06:44 PM, Shane McCarron wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > At a recent W3C PFWG meeting, the group (again) lamented the lack
> > of a standard way to get a list of all the Event listeners (of a
> > specific type, at a specific element, etc) in the DOM.
> >
> > We are happy to put together a proposal about this, with use cases,
> > but we are not sure if we should target this at the DOM itself or
> > at the DOM Events specification.
> >
> > Obviously we are not looking to rock the boat here w.r.t DOM4 or
> > anything. We are just trying to figure out who we should be talking
> > to about getting this included in some future specification.
>
> The DOM specification is a living standard, so don't worry about
> rocking boats.
>
> However, this has been discussed and rejected several times before; is
> there any new information that suggests a reasonable chance to
> overturn those decisions? If not, I would advise against reopening the
> discussion.
>
> HTH
> Ms2ger
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTx/75AAoJEOXgvIL+s8n2Ok0IAI2u0Jwka4Dqyi0VcGQgvYRJ
> cbAq8agq287hSyplUSJ6VmDvQbD4slDLRvVCuwS7hCAOSpoUsKIxgu4WNJhaUEhJ
> hDtBGHnvL3JxD0jk3Jmf1Zn5lY98nms9cevpjWHWEjo8qrXbWrf4wfc5KeHeltWX
> uKEk2Rm4ggO2RxZjQDMcT3l6OeVRXqbBf8czn9qW8oGJq6XFLN7/4t16Uwg0nkCA
> YyUO5OO7qnpE7wC5Y3R6u131BWx4LmONfxufERtfhqRHgm4E/TlBb0stXqcukv1K
> NI7CToBc2toRQ+f6Tu/n9GhqgdTSNbli27dACOaPiJv5nAv/xEZTGuriFt0TRko=
> =tH6j
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>