RE: Adding an interface to provide a list of listeners

"Gunderson, Jon R" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.dom.general
Message-ID <46739F12637CC94E82F75FF874E4A1473642EBCB@CITESMBX6.ad.uillinois.edu>
The enumerating event handler issues are a huge problem for web accessibility evaluation checking tools.

We have to use proprietary APIs to get event handler information for the rules in the OpenAjax Accessibility Evaluation library.

Tools we are developing using proprietary APIs to get event information:

AInspector Sidebar for Firefox:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ainspector-sidebar/

FAE 2.0
http://fae20.cita.illinois.edu/


Jon


From: Karl Groves [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 5:51 PM
To: Shane McCarron
Cc: Ms2ger; [email protected]; W3C WAI Protocols & Formats
Subject: Re: Adding an interface to provide a list of listeners

I'm not sure the reply "this been discussed and rejected several times before ... I would advise against reopening the discussion."  is terribly helpful. To Shane's original question: which WG would be best to address this with or to search down the history of the relevant discussions? Is there a way to get access to those previous discussions or at least a summary as to why?

Frankly, it does indeed seem like a worthwhile feature request. A google search for "Get event listener" retrieves over a million results
https://www.google.com/search?q="get+event+listener"

I'm also personally aware of others' desire for something like "getEventListener"
https://www.google.com/search?q=getEventListener

And that search turns up almost a quarter-of-a-million results. The top results are quite relevant to this discussion and also demonstrate that many people are looking for such a thing.  The fact is, the browsers themselves already have this, but it isn't exposed in a way that devs can get to.



On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Shane McCarron <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Oooh!  I was unaware that it had been discussed previously.  I will do a mailing list search.  If you have any pointers, I would love to see them.

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Ms2ger <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Shane,


On 07/17/2014 06:44 PM, Shane McCarron wrote:
> Hi!
>
> At a recent W3C PFWG meeting, the group (again) lamented the lack
> of a standard way to get a list of all the Event listeners (of a
> specific type, at a specific element, etc) in the DOM.
>
> We are happy to put together a proposal about this, with use cases,
> but we are not sure if we should target this at the DOM itself or
> at the DOM Events specification.
>
> Obviously we are not looking to rock the boat here w.r.t DOM4 or
> anything. We are just trying to figure out who we should be talking
> to about getting this included in some future specification.
The DOM specification is a living standard, so don't worry about
rocking boats.

However, this has been discussed and rejected several times before; is
there any new information that suggests a reasonable chance to
overturn those decisions? If not, I would advise against reopening the
discussion.

HTH
Ms2ger

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTx/75AAoJEOXgvIL+s8n2Ok0IAI2u0Jwka4Dqyi0VcGQgvYRJ
cbAq8agq287hSyplUSJ6VmDvQbD4slDLRvVCuwS7hCAOSpoUsKIxgu4WNJhaUEhJ
hDtBGHnvL3JxD0jk3Jmf1Zn5lY98nms9cevpjWHWEjo8qrXbWrf4wfc5KeHeltWX
uKEk2Rm4ggO2RxZjQDMcT3l6OeVRXqbBf8czn9qW8oGJq6XFLN7/4t16Uwg0nkCA
YyUO5OO7qnpE7wC5Y3R6u131BWx4LmONfxufERtfhqRHgm4E/TlBb0stXqcukv1K
NI7CToBc2toRQ+f6Tu/n9GhqgdTSNbli27dACOaPiJv5nAv/xEZTGuriFt0TRko=
=tH6j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




--
Karl Groves
Senior Technical Lead Accessibility Software Consultant & Director of Training
The Paciello Group
@karlgroves
Phone: +1 443-875-7343
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.