Re: Behavior of matches() and closest() with :scope()
Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.dom.general,gmane.comp.web.css.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADnb78jkq8aZ+Di5vAtJuK6yW6JEkbfCwEBNDCxSsbqArb=Qrg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > #1 is what I was intending, but looking at closest() now, I don't see > a restriction to just compound selectors. If complex selectors are > allowed, then I guess it makes more sense to match matches() and have > :scope refer to the element you're matching against. It makes it > harder to do some things, but they're probably rare and can be handled > explicitly anyway. Hmm yes, so 2) then? :-) -- http://annevankesteren.nl/