Re: CfC: publish WG Note of UI Events; deadline November 14

On 11/19/14 9:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Arthur Barstow <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Although there appears to be agreement that work on the [uievents] spec
>> should stop, the various replies raise sufficient questions that I consider
>> this CfC (as written) as failed.
>>
>> Travis, Gary - would you please make a specific proposal for these two
>> specs? In particular, what is the title and shortname for each document, and
>> which spec/shortname becomes the WG Note?
>>
>> After we have agreed on a way forward, I'll start a new CfC.
>>
>> (I believe the Principle of Least Surprise here means considering specs that
>> currently reference [uievents] or [DOM-Level-3-Events]. F.ex., I suppose a
>> document titled "UI Events" with a shortname of DOM-Level-3-Events could be
>> a bit confusing to some, although strictly speaking could be done.)
> My proposal would be to update UI Events with the latest editor's
> draft of DOM Level 3 Events (title renamed, of course) and have the
> DOM Level 3 Events URL redirect to UI Events. That would communicate
> clearly what happened.

Yves, Philippe - can Anne's proposal be done?