RE: Defining a constructor for Element and friends
Domenic Denicola <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:26:03 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.dom.general,gmane.org.w3c.webapps |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CY1PR0501MB13691404E3C4EBE8F234F3F0DF410@CY1PR0501MB1369.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> |
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:[email protected]] > I know that this a major concern to you, but my impression is that few if any other people regard that as anything more than "nice to have", especially if you equate "explaining" with having a public API for it. How do you propose having a private constructor API? How do you propose instances of the objects even existing at all, if there is no constructor that creates them? This is one of those "only makes sense to a C++ programmer" things.