Re: HTMLTableElement31.xml

"Rick Rivello" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.dom.test-suites.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
It is not in the original L1 spec but
is in L1(Second Edition).

I previously asked this question to
the mailing list but did not receive
and answer about items in the
L1(Second Edition).

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom-ts/2002Jul/0001.html
 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Arnold, Curt" <[email protected]>
To: "'Rick Rivello'" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:11 PM
Subject: RE: HTMLTableElement31.xml


> Totally empty <TABLE> elements are not valid HTML or XHTML since the DTD's
> requires at least one TBODY or TR to appear in the content model of a TABLE.
> I believe that was the motivation of my changing the test document to not
> have empty tables which had the side effect of compromising the motivation
> of this test.
> 
> Creating and adding a table element through the DOM as the test apparently
> does appears to be the best way to test that passage without requiring
> implementations to accept invalid documents.
> 
> Is the passage you quoted in both L1 and L2 HTML?
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.