Re: HTMLTableElement31.xml
"Rick Rivello" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.dom.test-suites.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It is not in the original L1 spec but is in L1(Second Edition). I previously asked this question to the mailing list but did not receive and answer about items in the L1(Second Edition). http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom-ts/2002Jul/0001.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Arnold, Curt" <[email protected]> To: "'Rick Rivello'" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:11 PM Subject: RE: HTMLTableElement31.xml > Totally empty <TABLE> elements are not valid HTML or XHTML since the DTD's > requires at least one TBODY or TR to appear in the content model of a TABLE. > I believe that was the motivation of my changing the test document to not > have empty tables which had the side effect of compromising the motivation > of this test. > > Creating and adding a table element through the DOM as the test apparently > does appears to be the best way to test that passage without requiring > implementations to accept invalid documents. > > Is the passage you quoted in both L1 and L2 HTML? >