Re: Status check
"Curt Arnold" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.dom.test-suites.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <011401c202e5$52e7bb40$a800a8c0@CurtMicron> |
Robert Clary wrote: > Ok. I will put together an example and post it so we can use it as a > straw man for discussion. My first inclination is to allow a JSUnit test page to be able to provide a configuration page in a frame. Something like: 1) Select the test from the browse button 2) The contents of the configuration page appears in a frame below the test selection. The page would allow you to select implementation and configuration (validating/non-validating, preserve entities/expand entities, etc). The configuration page for the test would either be implied from the filename or might be determined by loading the test and evaluating a function. 3) When the test is run, a JSUnit method can be used to obtain the configuration document. Whether that is possible cross browser, I don't know. The boilerplate DOM TS code should hide all the gore from the DOM test itself. The tests should be oblivious to the details of implementation selection.