Re: Bug rc3

I concur and will include it...we just need to shore up the quality
control and make sure the cache files inside are not shipped inside the
xcache directories.

Zoom

On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 00:57, saytheb wrote:
>     The main reason behind not including the xcache directory is to make
> sure to avoid previous conflicts where xcache was distrubted with cache
> files still located inside causing errors on pages. However, I don't see the
> harm in including it, and will make sure to check for an empty xcache before
> distributing the file.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Romeo Bandinelli" <cino-9O8nC7T3vzcsIb/[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 3:40 PM
> Subject: [envdev] Bug rc3
> 
> 
> > In the installation process: check file: xache instead of xcache
> >
> > Suggestion: in the doscribution why not to include the xcache directory?
> > Windows is not able to create it..
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Envdev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.madhatt.info/mailman/listinfo/envdev_madhatt.info
> >
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Envdev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.madhatt.info/mailman/listinfo/envdev_madhatt.info
> 
>