Re: Release name for Envolution 1.0
Scott Kindley <ckindley-/Nmu/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.envolution.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 21:09, James Pegram wrote: > While I understand the reason and *wanting* to use a > name of this nature. I think that would be like > pushing one button too many given everything going on > over there. Thats why I explained the name "Resolve" > > No matter how good the intentions, I think too many > people will interpret it as a jab and that may have > more of a negative effect than what is intended. Not sure about that if it was explained at release time. > > Envolution is known as Encompass and Encompass is an > excellent marketing name for this thing. It's already > got presence and branding, so why not leave it > Encompass? > > I know there will be an argument about the past and > the need to get away from events of that past, but I > believe the biggest mistake the PNDEV team made over > the last 5 days was use the name Phoenix, the > inference it makes didn't go over as they intended.... > Bad move on in my opinion... Envolution is the CMS...Encompass is the Theme Engine for Envolution. Just as PostNuke .64 was Mutant, and .70-.714 was Rogue I propse the Envolution version 1.0 be named "Resolve". Nothing is loosing it's branding at all. I think you misunderstood what I meant by a "release name". We won't have the problem they have with "Phoenix" simply because we are not naming an already named release a second time. They simply goofed up when they re-named the "adam_baum" release "Phoenix"..... > > I think the best thing we can do is maintain the > Encompass branding. This isn't about the theme engine or changing any branding...it's simply giving the Envolution Version 1.0 running Encompass a release name of "Resolve". Zoom > > JMO > > > --- TiMax <[email protected]> wrote: > > i agree ...... important is that ..... we don't must > > put "nuke " in name > > > > > > TiMax > > > > On 16 Aug 2002 17:24:36 -0500, Scott Kindley wrote: > > >I have been thinking about a release name. I would > > like to nominate > > >the following 1.0 release name: > > > > > >Envolution Version 1.0 - Resolve > > > > > >I would also like to dedicate this release to the > > survivors and > > >victims of the horrible tragedy that occurred > > September 11, 2001 at > > >the WTC Towers in New York City, NY USA. > > > > > >The reason for choosing the name "Resolve" AND > > honoring the > > >survivors and victims of that tragedy is to honor > > and memorialize > > >the perseverance, bravery, and committed effort > > demonstrated by the > > >fire fighters, police officers, and volunteers who > > went to the aid > > >of the occupants of the WTC towers. > > > > > >The people who tragically lost their lives in that > > unprovoked attack > > >were not just American citizens but citizens from > > numerous countries > > >located all over the globe. I can think of no > > better way we can show > > >or respect than to name the initial release > > "Resolve". > > > > > >Resolve Re*solve", n. > > >1. The act of resolving or making clear; > > resolution; > > >solution. > > > > > >``To give a full resolve of that which is so much > > controverted.'' > > >--Milton > > > > > >Any thoughts or comments?? > > > > > >Zoom > > > > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > Envdev mailing list > > >[email protected] > > > >http://www.madhatt.info/mailman/listinfo/envdev_madhatt.info > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Envdev mailing list > > [email protected] > > > http://www.madhatt.info/mailman/listinfo/envdev_madhatt.info > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs > http://www.hotjobs.com > > _______________________________________________ > Envdev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.madhatt.info/mailman/listinfo/envdev_madhatt.info > >