Re: FastCgiExternalServer vs FastCgiServer forruning php-fastcgi
"Emil A Eklund" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.fastcgi.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <002501c4b54a$756ecea0$f801a8c0@eaenet> |
Another advantage of using the external server approach, at least while developing, would be to aid in debugging as it's a lot easier to attach a debugger to a stand alone application. Not to mentation that you can recompile the application without having to restart the web server. /Emil ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]>; "Ken Gunderson" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 19:48 Subject: Re: [FASTCGI] FastCgiExternalServer vs FastCgiServer forruning php-fastcgi > > Using FastCgiExternalServer you can share the same FPHP pool among > different vhosts with FPHP pool running on the same machine. > > -Simon > > > On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:09:02 -0600, Ken Candors wrote: > >>Hello: >> >>Would someone please enlighten me regarding pros and cons of using >>FastCgiExternalServer vs. FastCgiServer for PHP?? I presently have >>FastCgiServer, PHP4, Apache2, SuExec all running nicely, per the FAQ, >>but have seen some other examples using external server, and am curious >>about under what circumstances one method would be better than the >>other (other than the obvious that you can have them running on >>different machines). >> >>TIA-- >> >>-- >>Best regards, >> >>Ken Gunderson >>GPG Key-- 9F5179FD >> >>"Freedom begins between the ears." -- Edward Abbey >> > > > > ___________________________________ > fastcgi-developers mailing list > http://fastcgi.com/fastcgi-developers/ > ___________________________________ fastcgi-developers mailing list http://fastcgi.com/fastcgi-developers/