Re: Working installation with Apache 2.0?

Dennis Birkholz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.fastcgi.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Yves,



Greets,
Dennis

> But right now I have a problem getting FastCGI to work in first
> instance: I tried the Debian 3.1 package libfcgi0 and then the FastCGI
> sources from 2003-11-11 (latest download archive), but both of them
> cannot be included in Apache. I added this line in the Apache configuration:
> LoadModule fastcgi_module /usr/local/lib/libfcgi.so
> [..]

what you did is to compile the fastCGI-lib but not the apache-module.

Download the apache-module from http://www.fastcgi.com/dist/ (look for
mod_fastcgi-x.x.x.tar.gz) and read the INSTALL.AP2 for detailed
instructions to create the module.

> To be honest, to me it looks a lot like FastCGI is dead for a long time
> now. We have the last release of over two years ago, the FAQ is
> incomplete, many sources on the web say it's hard to install and I have
> seen recent posts in the archives asking about Apache 2.2 support and
> the answer was something like "no". Is it worth the effort trying to get
> FastCGI to work or will I possibly face a problem when Apache makes an
> incompatible but required update and am I then forced to go back to the
> conventional CGI solution (with suPHP, which is the only reasonable
> secure multi-user setup still, besides FastCGI+suexec).

I just startet joining the mailing-list so i do not know if there is
nothing going on with fastCGI any more, but fastCGI seems to be stable
at all so there is no need for new upgrades.
The apache 2.2-support i have not yet tested.

Best wishes,
Dennis

___________________________________
fastcgi-developers mailing list
http://fastcgi.com/fastcgi-developers/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.