Re: Fwd: Re: Beginners Question
Chris Lightfoot <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.fastcgi.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 08:02:45PM +0000, jancha wrote: > On Wednesday 12 July 2006 16:37, Jose Adriano Baltieri wrote: > > Chris Lightfoot wrote: > > > > -- rather than having lots of threads, you can just have > > the webserver spawn lots of copies of this. Slightly less > > efficient, maybe, but much quicker to get up and running > > and much easier to debug. > > > > I need to understand it better... > > > > Considering the single-threaded model, some more questions : > > > > If I have 100 simultaneous requests, I'll have 100 copies of FASTCGIs > > loaded ? > > It depends on your FastCGI configuration. Well written c-app can handle 800 > requests per second or even more (also depends on your hardware) ;) So, there > will be one single fastcgi child working on them. no, because his child processes have to wait around for the completed file to be served up. But they'll just be waiting, so using processes may be acceptable. -- ``Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.'' (Groucho Marx) ___________________________________ fastcgi-developers mailing list http://fastcgi.com/fastcgi-developers/