Re: FastCGI licensing contact

Weslee Bilodeau <weslee.bilodeau-NEGAmrGOAmuW9VltB2KXpZqQE7yCjDx5@public.gmane.org>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.fastcgi.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Saju Pillai wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
>   We would like to ship FastCGI devkit client/server as part of a
> commercial product with some modifications. These modifications will
> break compatibility between opensource fastcgi implementations and our
> version (which is fine with us). The regular fcgi clients/servers will
> not be able to talk to the modified servers/clients - and we think such
> a change requires endorsement from the fcgi license owner(s). We have
> been unsuccessful in our attempts to contact the fcgi license owners.
> Can someone on the list help us locate them please.

Just off hand, but I don't see why you need them to endorse your product?

Provided you follow the public specification, it shouldn't matter.

If your breaking the devkit API thats one thing, and not really a big
deal. APIs vary. My company wrote our own based off the specification
thats nothing like the devkit API.

We didn't ask for anyones endorsement, as I'm sure the various perl,
python, PHP, .Net, C#, Delphi, etc kits didn't.

If your breaking the specification then you break compatibility with all
existing web servers, which in my opinion would make the kit useless?


> 
> regards
> srp
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ___________________________________
> fastcgi-developers mailing list
> http://fastcgi.com/fastcgi-developers/


Weslee
___________________________________
fastcgi-developers mailing list
http://fastcgi.com/fastcgi-developers/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.