Re: Terminated
double <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.fastcgi.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jay Sprenkle schrieb: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:48 AM, double <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Should the application - after receiving a SIGTERM - finish the > current > request? > > > I believe that is best. It's more friendly toward the user if they get > an explanation of a problem. Hello Jay, Thank you very much for your answer. Does mod_fastcgi not distinguish between * SIGTERM - terminate as quick as possible (e.g. webserver shutdown) * SIGUSR1 - finish current request and shut down In the apache error log there are a lot of [Mon Mar 16 17:21:16 2009] [warn] FastCGI: scheduled the start of the last (dynamic) server "/path" process: reached dynamicMaxClassProcs (10) The application receives a SIGTERM in that case, but should receive a SIGUSR1, shouldn't it? Thank you very much Marcus _______________________________________________ FastCGI-developers mailing list FastCGI-developers-xGejAJT2w6xVgU18Zptdi0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org http://mailman.pins.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/fastcgi-developers