IOCompletion Ports and FCGI application Questions

Bill / All,

 

I am currently implementing a fastcgi version of a server that I have on
windows.  My existing server uses iocompletion ports to perform async io on
socket handles.  I noticed in the file os_win32.c that you are using
iocompletion ports on windows in the fastcgi too.  I have a couple of
questions:

 

1.	If I use the fcgi defined functions defined in fcgi_stdio.h to read
and write data on the socket will the underlying fcgi functions use async io
to do this by default?  I am assuming that is the case after looking at the
code but I wanted to make sure I don't have to do anything special in my
code to enable async reads and writes.

 

2.	I like to use the optimized windows function TransmitFile() for
sending data across the network.  Does fcgi take advantage of this function?
If not, is there a way to get a hold of the requesting socket handle from my
fcgi application so I can use that function instead of a fwrite() call?  If
I did do that would it cause problems for the fcgi application framework?

 

3.	I want to make my fcgi executable a single multi-threaded
application in order to cache my application resources.  I am very familiar
with writing multi-threaded applications but wanted to know if anyone has
any tips or examples of the best way to do that with fcgi.  My initial
thought is to create a pool of worker threads that is twice the size of the
number of processors of the machine combined with a second pool of http
requests received by FCGI_Accecpt().  My thread pool manager will broker the
incoming requests to the worker threads and let the FCGI_Accept() block when
my pool is full.  Does this sound like a decent strategy or can I do better?

 

4.	I want to support remote fcgi so I can move my application behind
the firewall and scale across 1 to n application servers.  I don't need per
session support and my target web server will be Apache.  What do I need to
do to make this work?  I have read the docs on the fcgi website but I am not
totally clear on what needs to be done to make this work.  Do I need to
spawn a listener thread for the remote application or is that handled by
fcgi?  Should the remote servers be windows services so I can make sure they
are always avaiable?  Has anyone used remote fcgi processes as services?  Is
that a practical solution?  I will be using TCP for my network
communication.

 

Best regards,

Martin

_______________________________________________
FastCGI-developers mailing list
FastCGI-developers-xGejAJT2w6xVgU18Zptdi0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org
http://mailman.pins.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/fastcgi-developers