Re: FastCGI still a smart choice in 2010?
"andylin02" <[email protected]> Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:14:48 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.fastcgi.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
all, I am staring fast-cgi I think I love it. ------------------ andylin ------------------ Original ------------------ From: "Jon Ribbens"<[email protected]>; Date: Wed, Apr 21, 2010 04:47 PM To: "Gordon Colburn"<[email protected]>; Cc: "fastcgi-developers"<[email protected]>; Subject: Re: [FASTCGI] FastCGI still a smart choice in 2010? On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:06:44PM -0400, Gordon Colburn wrote: > However, fastcgi is still commonly used to deploy PHP apps; on Apache, > fastcgi is arguably a more scalable technique for deploying PHP than is > mod_php. And, fastcgi is a great way to deploy C/C++ web applications, IMO. It's great for Python too - Python can have quite a slow start-up time, so keeping the process running is great. There are several Python FastCGI libraries, including one that I wrote (jonpy). _______________________________________________ FastCGI-developers mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.pins.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/fastcgi-developers _______________________________________________ FastCGI-developers mailing list FastCGI-developers-xGejAJT2w6xVgU18Zptdi0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org http://mailman.pins.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/fastcgi-developers