Re: fnord's status

Yes. Dietlibc. It's not that I could not get fnord working. It's that
to do so I needed to have dietlibc and I could not get it to compile
on armel.

Sorry, I should have been more specific. I got excited when I saw that
someone was asking about fnord first thing upon getting out of bed.

John Tocher

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Enrico Scholz
<[email protected]> wrote:
> John Tocher <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Fnord does not work (as far as I know) with armel which with debian
>> squeeze is the only version of arm
>
> That's probably due to 'dietlibc' which has (large) problems on ARM EABI
> (some weak functions do not return and jump into the next random code
> placed by the linker, missing (alarm, time, getrlimit) or incorrect
> (mmap) syscalls implementations).
>
> Some issues are fixed by https://github.com/ensc/dietlibc/commits/rebase
> which might require some testing.
>
>
> Enrico
>



--=20
podcast: =A0 http://sadayatana.com/
twitter: =A0 =A0 http://twitter.com/DarthBuddha
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Sadayatana/164592203582896
itunes: =A0 =A0 http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/sadayatana-podcast/id408=
497331