A fnord fork (a fnork?)
"Neale Pickett" <[email protected]> Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:21:19 -0600 (CST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.fnord |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm using fnord for my Capture The Flag contest (http://dirtbags.net/ctf/) and have been maintaining a forked version under git (http://woozle.org/~neale/gitweb.cgi?p=fnord). Last week I began seriously overhauling the code to better suit my needs. Here's the changelog so far: Add all patches from (defunct) Debian package Replace libowfat with libc Replace buffer_1 and buffer_2 with stdio Fix segfault with directory listing of / Replace compile-time options with command-line ones Add regression test suite Fix if-modified-since date parsing Make text content-types use charset=UTF-8 Change default content-type to application/octet-stream Makefile no longer overrides CC and CPP from parent makes Don't send Content-type if there's no content I'm currently working on a problem with CGI end-of-header parsing that I discovered with the regression test suite on different platforms. It occurs to me that: 1. Other people might be interested in this, and 2. It's diverged to the point that I should either rename it or claim maintainership This list seemed like the best place to find out about both points. I'm particularly interested in how Felix feels about point 2. The removal of libowfat seems like a big enough departure that he might prefer a fork, but who knows! Neale