RE: WOFF and extended metadata
"Levantovsky, Vladimir" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.fonts |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7534F85A589E654EB1E44E5CFDC19E3D03F20FEEAE@wob-email-01.agfamonotype.org> |
On Tuesday, June 08, 2010 4:05 PM Tal Leming wrote: > > On Jun 8, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote: > > > I would like to express my personal preference for option (b) for the > purposes of localization of metadata extensions. > > Just to clarify what we are talking about... > > Was the proposal for localized extension blocks? Like this: > > <metadata version="1.0"> > <uniqueid id="lalala.1.0" /> > <license url="http://lalala.com"> > <text lang="en">A license goes here.</text> > <text lang="fr">Un permis va ici.</text> > </license> > ... > <extensions lang="en"> > ... > </extensions> > <extensions lang="fr"> > ... > </extensions> > </metadata> > Yes, I believe this is the case. Only extension blocks would require matching key/value pairs, the main part of the metadata has all elements explicitly defined so there is no matching there and the localization of each value is straightforward. Thank you, Vlad