Re: WOFF and extended metadata
Laurence Penney <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.fonts |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 21 Jun 2010, at 19:36, Chris Lilley <[email protected]> wrote: > LP> Should the value be entity-encoded or not? > > Why on earth would you want to entiry encode it (or base-64 encode > it, or whatever other obfuscation) when it could be included directly? For the sake of a guaranteed, predictably simple document structure. One danger: What if the included unencoded XML uses elements already used in the metadata? Some clients would barf on the unexpected attributes and content of those elements. It seems I'm in a minority, possibly of one, on this issue of sandboxing the content... - L