Re: [css3-fonts] @font-face matching and font-style descriptor

John Hudson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.fonts,gmane.comp.web.css.general
Organization Tiro Typeworks
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

> I'd strongly desire some way to say "please simulate variants I'm not
> explicitly specifying"; I don't particularly care whether this is the
> default or some extra option I have to specify in @font-face.

That's a position I'm perfectly happy with. My broad take on this is 
that the web designer should be able to specify one of three positions:

1. Never simulate styles; if font is unavailable, fall back to a family 
that provides what is needed.

2. Simulating styles is just fine.

3. Explicitly simulate a style, i.e. use simulation here in preference 
to the style linked font.

[As an example of where the third position might be desirable, I have a 
novel set in one of my early typefaces that uses a simulated italic 
(mechanically sloped roman) for a particular voice in the text that the 
author and book designer wanted to be visually distinguished from 
regular italics.]

John Hudson
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.