Re: [css3-fonts] @font-face matching and font-style descriptor
John Hudson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.fonts,gmane.comp.web.css.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Tiro Typeworks |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > I'd strongly desire some way to say "please simulate variants I'm not > explicitly specifying"; I don't particularly care whether this is the > default or some extra option I have to specify in @font-face. That's a position I'm perfectly happy with. My broad take on this is that the web designer should be able to specify one of three positions: 1. Never simulate styles; if font is unavailable, fall back to a family that provides what is needed. 2. Simulating styles is just fine. 3. Explicitly simulate a style, i.e. use simulation here in preference to the style linked font. [As an example of where the third position might be desirable, I have a novel set in one of my early typefaces that uses a simulated italic (mechanically sloped roman) for a particular voice in the text that the author and book designer wanted to be visually distinguished from regular italics.] John Hudson