Re: [css3 fonts] font-specific features
Erik van Blokland <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.fonts,gmane.comp.web.css.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sep 19, 2010, at 8:04 PM, Richard Fink wrote: > Would it not make a lot of sense to include *a web page* along with the WOFF (or other format) to demonstrate features, rather than a PDF. That would be much, much more effective documentation because the CSS would be there for authors as well. Integrating the advanced features would become more of a cut-and-paste operation. I am assuming it would be quite time consuming for web authors to map what they see in a PDF to the equivalent CSS rules. > (Reserving judgment until I try doing so myself but experience says a web page with CSS rules to guide is going to be one heck of a lot easier.) Whether it's pdf or html is not really an issue here. The point is that this kind of documentation should not be part of the WOFF metadata. Erik