Re: More comments on WOFF metadata

On 11/24/2010 12:43 PM, Tal Leming wrote:
>
> Would adding these requirements [namespace] make existing files invalid?

Wrt. the current schema, yes.

>
>>> 2.1 On the localizability side, I would have expected that an element like<description>  would allow multiple<text>  elements, each with different lang attributes.
> This is already in the spec.

The schema says:

         <optional>
           <element name="description">
             <ref name="text"/>
           </element>
         </optional>

i.e. a single description. The proposal is to allow multiple 
descriptions, for different locales.

>
>>> 5. Licenses are not just translations of a text in different languages, they are also adaptations to local laws. I think this implies that the url and id attributes should instead be on the various<text>  elements inside<license>.
> Hm. The URL that the license element is directing the user to could handle this, no?

Since there is currently a single license URL, it would means that this 
URL would have to cover all the locales (the URL may use a scheme that 
does not have a machinery for locales). The proposal is to allow per 
locale URLs.


Eric.