RE: Comments on the WOFF Last Call

The following action does address my comment. Thank you very much.

Steve Zilles


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Lilley [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 6:22 AM
> To: Stephen Zilles
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Comments on the WOFF Last Call
> 
> On Wednesday, January 5, 2011, 6:35:22 PM, Stephen wrote:
> 
> SZ> I note the following:
> SZ> 1.       The introduction has normative conformance requirements.
> SZ> This does not seem like the right place for such MUSTs.
> 
> We agree, and have resolved to split this section into an Introduction
> proper, with no conformance requirements, and another (normative) section
> called 'General Requirements' which contains those conformance
> requirements.
> 
> Please confirm that this change, once made, addresses your comment.
> 
> Tracker, this relates to
> 
> ACTION-63: Respond to Stephen Zilles re. introduction/normative
> Chris Lilley
> 
> ACTION-64: Remove normative statements from introduction to new section
> 'General Requirements'
> Jonathan Kew
> 
> (Steve, your other comments will be the subject of separate mails, to help
> our last call tracking process).
> 
> 
> 
> --
>  Chris Lilley   Technical Director, Interaction Domain
>  W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
>  Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
>  Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups