On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:52:52 +1200
"Robert O'Callahan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:34 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Could you describe the expected advantage to exclude
>> UTF-16?
>>
>
>It's a lot simpler for anything consuming this data.
"Anything" is too broad to understand... Excuse me,
could you give me a concrete example of the system
or usecase that consumes WOFF but has some difficulty
to handle an XML in UTF-16?
I assume existing XML implementation can handle UTF-16
transparently, so I guess that the restriction to UTF-8
may introduce extra costs to fit existing XML handlers
for WOFF production.
Regards,
mpsuzuki
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.