Re: [OpenType] SVG Fonts inside of OpenType fonts? [Cross-post from [email protected]]
"Robert O'Callahan" <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:58:52 +1200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.fonts,gmane.comp.web.css.general,gmane.comp.web.svg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Levantovsky, Vladimir < [email protected]> wrote: > I had a similar question - why would this distinction should be introduced > at the potential expense of duplicating all glyph data? One possible way to > address it is to consider the initial state (frame 1) of animated glyph > description as its static representation if animation is not supported. > That is basically what we do for SVG images. I think we should carry on doing that for fonts. Rob -- "If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word is not in us." [1 John 1:8-10]