Re: css3-fonts: should not dictate usage policy with respect to origin
Glenn Adams <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:55:52 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.css.general,gmane.comp.web.fonts |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
if EvilCompany does not include an Origin header in its request, then BigCompany could not distinguish that request as coming from a pre-HTML5 UA (i.e., current conditions), in which this case devolves to the current read scenario; if BigCompany does not respond to fetches not containing an Origin, then again EvilCompany can guess an origin that permits access, resulting in a fetch; EvilCompany does not need to use a UA, but can construct their own HTTP client to accomplish this; the scenario you offer only prevents access if *every* HTTP client, whether UA or not, respects SOR; On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:59 PM, John Daggett <[email protected]> wrote: > > Glenn Adams wrote: > > > Regarding the last, please show me an attack based on font access that > > SOR prevents. > > One possible attack scenario: > > BigCompany decides to design a new logo. They commission a font > containing a special glyph with that logo in it. An access-restricted > site is created using that custom font. EvilCompany, a competitor, > would like to know about that logo before it is released publicly. They > insert script in web ads on popular sites that systematically attempt > to guess possible access-restricted URLs for the custom font. An > employee of BigCompany hits one of the pages on an external site > containing one of EvilCompany's webads. > > If no origin restriction exists, the web ad code can access the font as > long as they guess the right access-restricted URL and an > employee of BigCompany happens to have access. The script inserted in a > webad by EvilCompany accesses the custom logo glyph and sends it back to > an EvilCompany-controlled site. > > If font loads are restricted to same origin and the BigCompany hasn't > explicitly enabled cross-origin loading via CORS, the web ad code will > *never* be able to load the font even if their code guesses the right > access-restricted URL, since it's origin is different. > > The scenario is the same one as in the WebGL example I noted earlier, > without same origin restrictions content can be accessed via means > that are not immediately obvious to the naive author. > > Regards, > > John Daggett >