RE: Announcing new font compression project
Sylvain Galineau <[email protected]> Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:20:24 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.fonts |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <3C4041FF83E1E04A986B6DC50F01782907B5926E@TK5EX14MBXC296.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> |
--_000_3C4041FF83E1E04A986B6DC50F01782907B5926ETK5EX14MBXC296r_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Re-enacting old battles never goes out of style but if there is such intere=
st in it I suggest starting a separate thread (tentative subject line: 'The=
MTX conspiracy!'). I'd rather read concrete feedback on Raph's intruiguing=
proposal rather than the perceived intents of 2012 Monotype vs. 2009 Monot=
ype. The latter just seems the kind of discussion that is best had over bee=
rs. We might even get Vlad to buy the first round...
--_000_3C4041FF83E1E04A986B6DC50F01782907B5926ETK5EX14MBXC296r_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-micr=
osoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns=3D"http:=
//www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"=
>
<meta name=3D"Generator" content=3D"Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.il
{mso-style-name:il;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
<o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=3D"EN-US" link=3D"blue" vlink=3D"purple">
<div class=3D"WordSection1">
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Ca=
libri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Re-enacting old battles n=
ever goes out of style but if there is such interest in it I suggest starti=
ng a separate thread (tentative subject line: ‘The MTX conspiracy!=
217;).
I’d rather read concrete feedback on Raph’s intruiguing propos=
al rather than the perceived intents of 2012 Monotype vs. 2009 Monotype. Th=
e latter just seems the kind of discussion that is best had over beers. We =
might even get Vlad to buy the first round…<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Ca=
libri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span><=
/p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
--_000_3C4041FF83E1E04A986B6DC50F01782907B5926ETK5EX14MBXC296r_--