Re: [css3-fonts] subscript/superscript variants
"Tab Atkins Jr." <[email protected]> Wed, 9 May 2012 12:33:07 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.fonts,gmane.comp.web.css.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAWBYDBSXZ35EFpjXur4xJ77YHMRnHLjmy50MUbyOmfeu=Tr_A@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:46 AM, John Daggett <[email protected]> wrote: > =C2=A0* fallback occurs across a given text run rather than per-character Your argument and demonstration seems convincing. It would probably be very ugly in many cases to mix different methods of fallback in a single text run. > =C2=A0* the 'font-variant-position' property is defined independent of > =C2=A0 =C2=A0the existing use of the font-size/vertical-align properties = to > =C2=A0 =C2=A0synthesize subscripts/superscripts I can't quite tell from your email what you're suggesting this should do. I *think* it's asking for a property that switches to sub/sup glyphs if they all exist, otherwise falls back to synthesized, and has no special interaction with line-height/font-size/etc. This would mean that existing <sub>/<sup> styling wouldn't change - it would continue being fully synthetic unless we change the default stylesheet. Correct? ~TJ