Re: FreeMarker 2.4 branch src repo has moved to github

Jonathan Revusky <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.freemarker.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

Sorry to have been silent lately. I haven't had too much to say
really. I think this is a good step. I have been thinking I would
really like to put some effort into 2.4 and get it out. I am writing
from Dalian, China, and I was told by somebody just a day ago that
FreeMarker has very large user base in China. To have done something
with that much impact is very satisfying to me. In the last couple of
days, I have been thinking, even moping a bit, about why we got so
stuck on 2.3.x and 2.4.x never got out there.

I am reluctant to point fingers, since much of it must be my fault,
but that is all past. Maybe we really can do something.

I am going back to Spain tomorrow and I will at least get the git
repository going on my computer(s) and just try to get my head back in
the code.



On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here it is:
> https://github.com/freemarker/freemarker
>
> And again, this is only the source repository that has moved, not the
> bug tracker, nor the Wiki. And ATM only for the 2.4 branch. Do not try
> to commit into the SVN 2.4 branch anymore.
>
> I have already added 3 collaborators (people who can push into that
> repo directly): ddekany, szegedi, revusky. Feel free to push directly
> the "master" branch if what you are doing is not experimental.
>
> Why not 2.3.x on github? Well, I can create a branch for it if I have
> to... But no more 2.3.x release is planned unless some ugly bugs pop
> up. For the readers panicking: 2.4.0 will be almost like 2.3.17,
> except it has more up-to-date optional dependencies (like Jython
> 2.2.1+ is required, if you are using Jython at all) and some better
> defaults (like SLF4J is the default logger), and GAE compatibility.
> These are not 100% backward-compatible changes, and thus the 2nd
> version had to change, following out version policy. But migrating to
> 2.4.0 will be trivial. These are really mostly just "integration"
> changes.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>  Daniel Dekany
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
> With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
> you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
> Download your free trial now.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
> _______________________________________________
> FreeMarker-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemarker-devel
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, 
you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
Download your free trial now. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.