Re: XDocReport, IDE support (Was: Re: Anybody with deeper OSGi bundle can comment on freemarker.jar OSGification?)

> OK, let's consider 2) as the goal for now, and then we will see if it
> a realistic goal with this JavaCC stuff we have. Yet, as plan B, is it
> a standard approach that you have a special parser for the IDE, but
> for the error markings you are using the production parser? Because if
> the syntax coloring and outline and such errs in some edge cases (like
> around the glitches in the production parser...), but still only marks
> templates as error free that will not fail during parsing on the
> server, that's maybe a good enough.


Daniel, it was very long that I have developed the Freemarker plugin, but
for errors syntax I used the existing FM parser.
I'm very busy for the moment, but if some people are really interested with
this plugin (to contribute too),
I will try to find time to restart it. I think it can be good too that you
develop this plugin to improve the FM parser.
It will avoid writing a lot of mails and you will see the whole problems if
you join in this plugin development.

Regards Angelo

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
3. A single system of record for all IT processes
http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j

_______________________________________________
FreeMarker-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemarker-devel