Re: Continue Eclipse Freemarker DLTK?

What do you mean by "manage with 2.3"?


I mean that DLTK Freemarker will use FM 2.3 and not 3.0


> You want to modify FM, or it's
> plugin development only?


My first step is just modify or comments code of DLTK Freemarker.

After I would like contribute with my code
https://github.com/angelozerr/Freemarker-Eclipse-DLTK/tree/master/freemarker.provisionnal/src/freemarker/provisionnal
to
FM to improve debugger and contribute to FM tools.

I'm OK with both, except that you will have
> to send a signed Contributor License Agreement for modifying FM
> itself.
>

In last past I had send a CLA to Atila (to commit in the svn FM), is not
enough?

Regards Angelo

>
> --
> Thanks,
>  Daniel Dekany
>
>
> > Regards Angelo
> >
> >
> > 2013/7/25 Daniel Dekany <[email protected]>
> > Thursday, July 25, 2013, 4:40:28 PM, Angelo zerr wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> OK I understand why you don't want expose the AST API. Thank's for your
> information.
> >>
> >> The DLTK ASTNode is used for several features like folding,
> >> refactoring, search, codeassist.
> >>
> >> You can read info about ASTNode at
> >> http://wiki.eclipse.org/DLTK_Core_Architecture
> >> It's difficult for me to tell you now which info are required  to
> >> build a DLTK ASTNode.
> >
> > Then, to start somewhere... I think, org.freemarker:tooling will give
> > you an abstract FTLVisitor class, which however will only have two
> > kind of visit-s for now: visit(ElementInfo) and visit(ExpressionInfo).
> > (That's so that the plugin or other tools won't assume that they know
> > all the directives and expression types.) (Note that the 3.0 API
> > didn't visit expressions at all, only elements.) And then I start
> > adding properties to these XxxInfo-s as the need arises. Like,
> > isFoldable(), isOutlineNode and getOutlineNodeLabel for starters. The
> > initial "accept" method of the tools API could have a Query object (a
> > JavaBean again) as parameter, in which you can specify what are you
> > interested in (like, folding and/or outline nodes and/or variables
> > used, etc). So as you move ahead, we will see if it's appropriate at
> > all. And of course I'm open for suggestions.
> >
> >> I will try to switch to 2.3 and I will see what we need.
> >>
> >> My work about AST was very simply (I have just managed #assign in
> >> the AST to display the variable name of assign in the Outline View).
> >> But perhaps for Freemarker, the Outline View should display more
> >> info like JBoss IDE
> >
> > JBoss IDE's outline is useless IMAO. It shows far too much. After all,
> > the goal of an outline view is to show you a summary that's good for
> > navigation (among others). Although I'm not entirely sure how the
> > outlook should look. It has to show #macro and #function, and that's
> > already useful, but what else?
> >
> >> and your idea about freemaker-tool.jar is perhaps a good idea.
> >
> > (I wonder what's the proper term is. "tooling" or "tools"? Like
> > "FreeMarker Tooling API" or "FreeMarker Tools API"... or even
> > "tool-helpers"...)
> >
> >> I have not experimented a lot the capability of the DLTK ASTNode
> >> but at the end of the http://wiki.eclipse.org/DLTK_Core_Architecture
> >> it says "Use of the DLTK AST is not mandatory, but some DLTK
> >> features like folding may rely on it and it can greatly simplify
> implementation."
> >>
> >> For the completion (interpolation) I don't use the ASTNode but I
> >> think I should to use it (so I need a more complex AST).
> >
> > For that you need the variable names used, in a hierarchy. Like, on
> > the top-level you have "user" and "department", but after "user." the
> > possibilities are different, like "user.name" etc. If DLTK can extract
> > such info from the AST, we might as well add that in ExpressionInfo.
> > Also there's the case where some of the data-model variables has a
> > known class (that's not a FreeMarker feature).
> >
> >> So I must switch to 2.3, my first idea is to try to remove the use
> >> of DLTK ASTNode an dmanage other features like syntax errors and debug.
> >>
> >> Regards Angelo
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> >  Daniel Dekany
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
> > Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
> > Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
> > Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
> >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> > _______________________________________________
> > FreeMarker-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemarker-devel
> >
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

_______________________________________________
FreeMarker-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemarker-devel