Re: Changing license to Apache License 2.0?
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> Fri, 9 Aug 2013 10:58:36 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.freemarker.user,gmane.comp.web.freemarker.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
So then, starting FreeMarker 2.3.21: - The license will be "Apache License, Version 2.0" - The copyright owner will change from "Visigoth Software Society" to: "Attila Szegedi, Daniel Dekany, Jonathan Revusky" If anybody has anything comments on this matter, go ahead. -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany Thursday, August 8, 2013, 10:48:41 AM, Jonathan Revusky wrote: > Sorry to have been so slow. I have no objection to the proposed license changes. > > JR > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Attila Szegedi <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, I'm totally fine with owner names' change. > > Yeah, changing to 3-clause BSD would also work. I'm actually fine > with Apache too; if anyone's using FM with GPLv2, they won't be able > to update, but then it's at least a decision we consciously made. > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote: > The problem with our licence is the advertisement clause. With that, > our license is not even OSI-approved (anymore?), and most importantly, > many has complained about this restriction. To fix that, we could just > switch to 3-clause BSD license. But I thought that if we change the > licence anyway, ASL 2 would be better, as it's far more widely used > and as such more recognized in the Java world. Corporate layers can > have surprising ideas (like, some may will miss the patent > indemnification clause in the future... I really don't know), so I > thought the safest thing to do is to join the herd. > > That ASL 2 is incompatible with GPLv2 is a good point, however, given > how omnipresent ASL 2 is in the Java ecosystem, I wonder what will use > FreeMarker (especially a new version of it) and yet not have any ASL 2 > dependency. So is that a real problem? > > Note the other important change as well: the owner will change. Any > comments on that? > > -- > Thanks, > Daniel Dekany > > > Wednesday, July 24, 2013, 2:55:45 PM, Attila Szegedi wrote: > >> I'm somewhat interested in the "why". >> >> The only substantial difference I see between the two licenses is >> that Apache also has patent indemnification clauses. Admittedly, I >> think that's a good thing, but I'm wondering if that's a substantial >> need for most of our users. >> >> One specific issue where BSD is more permissive than Apache is that >> BSD is one-way compatible with GPLv2 (e.g. you can incorporate BSD >> software into GPLv2 software), but Apache isn't, specifically >> because of the patent indemnification language that GPLv2 lacks; >> Apache is one-way compatible with GPLv3 though. >> >> So, one consequence of the switch from BSD to Apache would be that >> people could no longer incorporate FreeMarker into software that's >> offered under GPLv2. I'm not saying that I'm against the move, just >> saying that I want to make sure everybody understands the implications. >> >> Attila. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote: >> I would like to change the licence of FreeMarker from the 4-clause >> BSD-style licence to Apache License 2.0. The copyright owner would >> also change from "The Visigoth Software Society" (VSS) to "Attila >> Szegedi, Dániel Dékány, Jonathan Revusky" (they are the current >> project owners according the CLA) as VSS is inactive. This I would >> like to do as soon as possible, like even starting from FreeMarker >> 2.3.21. >> >> Attila, Jonathan, do you agree, or want something differently? >> >> Anybody has advices or any comments on this mater? (Like, if you >> depend heavily on FreeMarker and have a company lawyer to ask, that >> would great. All help is appreciated!) >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Daniel Dekany >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics > Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics > Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. > Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > FreeMarker-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemarker-user > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics > Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics > Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. > Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > FreeMarker-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemarker-user > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk