Re: Any plans for a 100% wm syntax compatibility?

Monday, March 24, 2008, 11:16:57 AM, Demetrios Kyriakis wrote:

[snip]
> This would not be a problem cause it's not required as the actual
> implementation is using Velocity, and
> the main reason for switch would be the fact that this engine is alive, not
> the extra features.

Despite of Velocity is not evolving (as you said), what benefit you
hope from switching to FM if you have to keep the old templates as-is,
and you don't need any extra features either? I mean, if you just will
have Velocity templates after the switching, then what is changed for
you then?

> Thank you,
>
> Demetrios.

-- 
Best regards,
 Daniel Dekany


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/