Re: Any plans for a 100% wm syntax compatibility?

Jonathan Revusky wrote:
> Tim Diggins wrote:
>   
>  
> And typical programming stuff, like nesting 
> macro calls recursively now works because, unlike the Velocity rendering 
> engine, it doesn't pass all macro parameters in as values, not as 
> strings to later be reparsed (!)
I meant, unlike Velocity, it *does* pass all macro parameters in as 
values, not as strings to later be reparsed.


JR

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace